In architectural and engineering design, Revit templates play a pivotal role in shaping the efficiency and consistency of projects. Architects and Engineers often choose between developing two different primary template types: additive and subtractive. In this blog, we'll explore these template variations and the importance of finding a middle ground where you can have the best of both methods.
Additive Templates: Building as You Go
Additive templates function like a toolbox with essential resources that Architects and Engineers can utilize as needed throughout a project. Rather than starting with a preloaded template, professionals begin with a minimal structure and incorporate specific tools and components as the project unfolds. This approach offers flexibility, allowing them to adapt to unique project requirements.
However, it's crucial to use additive templates judiciously. They can sometimes lead to extensive customization, potentially slowing down the project.
Subtractive Templates: Comprehensive from the Start
Subtractive templates, in contrast, come fully equipped with a comprehensive set of tools and resources right from the beginning. Architects and Engineers can imagine them as a fully packed suitcase before embarking on a trip. These templates include everything needed for a project and allow professionals to disable or remove elements that aren't relevant.
The advantage of subtractive templates is their ability to streamline workflows, especially for projects with predictable requirements. However, overloading a template with unnecessary elements can lead to clutter and confusion.
Finding the Balance: Convergence
The intersection of additive and subtractive templates represents a balanced approach that acknowledges the strengths of both types. In this convergence zone, Architects and Engineers identify the core essential for either template to function effectively. These essentials serve as a foundation for both approaches, and it's the sweet spot for your future template development.
Complementing the balanced template with container files will allow the main template to remain lean and updated over time and to develop container files in sprints as needed. With more Content Management Systems able to host container files and distribute them across an organization, this method is more attainable.
By defining these shared essentials, professionals can have a balanced template as project demands evolve. This approach ensures adaptability while maintaining a consistent baseline of project standards.
Navigating the Template Landscape
Architects and Engineers should approach template creation strategically. It's essential to avoid unnecessary reinvention of established firm processes. Integrating existing standards and best practices into templates helps maintain consistency and efficiency.
Professionals should focus on two key categories when creating templates: template settings and project content. Template settings are graphics, system families, units, etc. Project content is sheets, scope boxes, levels, etc. A methodical breakdown of subcategories within each ensures that templates align with the firm's design practice needs.
Ultimately, the choice between additive and subtractive templates depends on the firm's preferences. Both approaches can yield efficiency and consistency when used wisely. Architects and Engineers must select the template type that best aligns with their projects and empowers them to create exceptional designs.
In our next blog, we'll delve deeper into the nuances of template settings, offering insights into crafting the blueprint for efficient BIM projects. Stay tuned as we continue our journey toward architectural and engineering excellence.
Comments